首页> 外文OA文献 >Crack Sealing and Filling: Best Practices
【2h】

Crack Sealing and Filling: Best Practices

机译:裂缝密封和填充:最佳实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the current state of practice for crack sealing/filling. In addition, the INDOT crack sealing/filling practice was experimentally evaluated for the effectiveness of crack sealing/filling, the effectiveness of routing, the performance of the different types of crack sealants and fillers, the validity of sealant performance grade system, and the crack sealing/filling equipment performance. The key findings from an extensive literature review and nationwide/statewide survey performed in 2012 are the following: 1) 65% of the responses indicated that the routing is required for the crack sealing/filling application; 2) ASTM D 6690 Type II was the most widely used sealant type and only Missouri and Indiana included emulsions in their specifications as crack sealing/filling materials; and 3) crack sealing/filling equipment availability and their maintenance were the biggest concerns.Based on the two-year experimental investigation, the crack sealing/filling was determined to be effective in preventing the occurrence of pavement surface crack distress. The crack sealing/filling was concluded to be effective in maintaining crack integrity and resisting sealant and filler deformations due to the seasonal crack movement. The routing was not determined to be effective in terms of the pavement performances. However, Adhesive/Cohesive/Spalling (ACS) failure results showed that the routed sections significantly outperformed the non-routed sections. In addition, the test results indicated that the ASTM 6690 Type II crack sealants performed relatively well in terms of pavement and crack performance. The correlation between the sealant performance grades and the pavement and crack performances with different types of sealants and fillers were poor and insignificant.The mixed results regarding the effectiveness of the routing were obtained from the literature review and the field evaluation. As a result, it was recommended from the SAC meeting that routing in the 2090 Activity be limited to a single transverse crack (reflective cracks) on asphalt concrete over concrete pavements. INDOT currently uses the ASTM Type II crack sealants, which showed an overall good pavement and crack performances in the evaluation. Therefore, the current INDOT crack sealant material selection process (ASTM Type II) is concluded to be adequate.The experimental results showed that the cracks on wet pavement treated with HAL had significantly higher bonding between the materials and the asphalt pavement surface than the cracks treated with the conventional air compressor. Therefore, the incorporation of a hot air lance in the wet condition is recommended to extend the operable time and seasonal availability for crack filling and sealing construction (2070 and 2090 Activities).
机译:这项研究调查了裂缝密封/填充的当前实践状态。此外,对INDOT裂缝密封/填充方法进行了实验评估,以评估裂缝密封/填充的有效性,布线的有效性,不同类型的裂缝密封剂和填料的性能,密封剂性能等级体系的有效性以及裂缝密封/灌装设备性能。在2012年进行的广泛文献回顾和全国/州范围内的调查中,得出的主要结论如下:1)65%的答复表明,裂缝密封/填充应用需要布线; 2)ASTM D 6690 II型是使用最广泛的密封剂类型,只有密苏里州和印第安纳州在其规格中将乳液作为裂缝密封/填充材料; 3)裂缝密封/填充设备的可用性和维护是最大的问题。基于两年的实验研究,确定裂缝密封/填充对于防止路面裂缝的发生是有效的。得出的结论是,裂纹密封/填充有效地保持了裂纹的完整性,并抵抗了由于季节性裂纹运动而引起的密封胶和填料变形。就人行道性能而言,该路线确定为无效。但是,粘合/内聚/剥落(ACS)失败结果表明,布线部分明显优于非布线部分。此外,测试结果表明,ASTM 6690 II型裂缝密封胶在铺装和裂缝性能方面表现相对较好。密封胶性能等级与不同类型的密封胶和填料的路面和裂缝性能之间的相关性较差和微不足道。从文献综述和现场评估中得出的有关布线效果的混合结果是混合的。因此,SAC会议建议将“ 2090年活动”中的路线限制在混凝土路面上的沥青混凝土上的单个横向裂缝(反射性裂缝)。 INDOT目前使用ASTM II型裂缝密封胶,在评估中显示出总体良好的铺装性和裂缝性能。因此,得出结论认为目前的INDOT裂缝密封胶材料选择工艺(ASTM II型)是足够的。实验结果表明,用HAL处理的湿路面上的裂缝在材料与沥青路面表面之间的结合力明显高于所处理的裂缝。与传统的空气压缩机。因此,建议在潮湿条件下使用热风枪,以延长裂纹填充和密封结构的可操作时间和季节性可用性(2070和2090活动)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号